This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
PATCH for Re: bugs fixed in 3.0.3 -- second draft
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
- Cc: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 02:00:26 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: PATCH for Re: bugs fixed in 3.0.3 -- second draft
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Neil Booth wrote:
> I agree - if you (or someone else) create an HTML template to list bug
> fixes in, we should get committers to add their fixes to it under the
> relevant category. It won't take much additional time. Having it in
> HTML on the web pages also means users can see real-time bug-fix
> status during development, without having to wait for a release
> announcement.
>
> We should do something similar for 3.1 starting now IMO. Do you
> agree?
I just committed the patch below. Instead of features.html as for
previous releases I called this changes.html.
Gerald
*** /dev/null Sun Dec 23 11:36:04 2001
--- changes.html Mon Dec 24 01:57:27 2001
***************
*** 0 ****
--- 1,32 ----
+ <html>
+
+ <head>
+ <title>GCC 3.1 Changes, New Features, and Fixes</title>
+ </head>
+
+ <body>
+ <h1 align="center">GCC 3.1 Changes, New Features, and Fixes</h1>
+
+ <ul>
+ <li>General Optimizer Improvements</li>
+ <ul>
+ <li>dummy</li>
+ </ul>
+
+ <li>New Languages and Language specific improvements</li>
+
+ <li>New Targets and Target Specific Improvements</li>
+
+ <li>Documentation improvements</li>
+
+ <li>Other significant improvements</li>
+ </ul>
+
+ <h2>Specific Fixes</h2>
+
+ <ul>
+ <li>dummy</li>
+ </ul>
+
+ </body>
+ </html>