This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Ada] Corrections to gnat-style.texi
- From: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Cc: <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <bosch at gnat dot com>, <dewar at gnat dot com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 20:34:09 +0100
- Subject: Re: [Ada] Corrections to gnat-style.texi
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112221827350.10487-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>
"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> writes:
> On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> etc.), and @syntax for ARM grammar elements. Use @r for English
>> text in comments. Use @emph for emphasis. Change "if-statements"
>
> I was told by brosgol@gnat.com (working on fixing the issues I pointed out
> in gnat_rm.texi) that they preferred to use the standard Ada convention of
> italics for comments, via a @cmt{} macro.
@cmt{} macro? I cant find this one in the Texinfo documentation.
>> + * gnat-syle: (gnat-syle). GNAT Coding Style
>
> gnat-style, not gnat-syle (twice in this line).
Argh, thanks. Fixed in my local copy.
>> @author Ada Core Technologies, Inc.
>
> The GNU Coding Standards say that
>
> Please credit the principal human writers of the manual as the
> authors, on the title page of the manual. If a company sponsored the
> work, thank the company in a suitable place in the manual, but do not
> cite the company as an author.
>
> This probably needs to go on your list of open issues for someone to fix.
Yes, I agree. (However, this is not the only place in which referring
to Ada Core Technologies contradicts GNU recommendations.)