This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch: Fix for PR 5088
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: apbianco at cygnus dot com
- Cc: Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Java Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 16 Dec 2001 15:57:34 -0700
- Subject: Re: Patch: Fix for PR 5088
- References: <87n10i245f.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <15389.9339.463629.896263@makita.cygnus.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Alex" == Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com> writes:
Alex> I thought I carefully made the choice of how ctors should be
Alex> mangled but I was using some other criteria (observation of what
Alex> worked and what didn't IIRC.) Anyways, I think you can go ahead
Alex> and check this in.
If you used a C1 constructor without the corresponding runtime patch,
it indeed wouldn't work. That's probably what happened.
Tom