This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Ada runtime 64 bit fixes

From: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>
To: guerby at acm dot org
Cc: rupp at gnat dot com, rth at redhat dot com, schwab at suse dot de, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 00:14:24 +0100
Subject: Re: Ada runtime 64 bit fixes
References: <je4rn5clu1.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20011206100003.B9416@redhat.com><87u1v47zm8.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <065d01c17ea4$008cd350$0500a8c0@lapcat><200112062235.fB6MZRo03130@ulmo.localdomain>

<guerby@acm.org> writes:

> Why aren't we using Interfaces.C.long here? It is supposed to match
> the C compiler one.

We need Interfaces.C.time_t (which would be a type derived from the
Interfaces.C type corresponding to the arithmetic C type in question).
Obviously, this doesn't solve the problem.

References:
- Ada runtime 64 bit fixes
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: Ada runtime 64 bit fixes
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Ada runtime 64 bit fixes
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: Ada runtime 64 bit fixes
  - From: Douglas B. Rupp
- Re: Ada runtime 64 bit fixes
  - From: guerby

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]