This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 3.0.3 PATCH: Properly fix stdio.h on Tru64 UNIX V5.1A

From: Rainer Orth <ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
To: Bruce Korb <bkorb at pacbell dot net>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Bruce Korb <bkorb at gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 21:16:48 +0100 (MET)
Subject: Re: 3.0.3 PATCH: Properly fix stdio.h on Tru64 UNIX V5.1A
References: <15362.39339.871973.663540@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE><3C02B044.4BF02009@pacbell.net>

Bruce Korb writes:

> It looks safe to me, but at least one person with a Tru64
> platform ought to sanity check it.

Indeed, although I'm more worried that the patch might break other
platforms than causing problems on Tru64 UNIX: __VA_LIST__ doesn't occur in
stdio.h in V4.0F and V5.1, nor on Solaris 2.4, 2.5.1, 2.6, 8, or 9 Beta or
IRIX 6.2 or 6.5.  That's all I can check here.

Wrt. Tru64 UNIX, I've bootstrapped on V5.1 (where the patch isn't needed)
without regressions.  I'm awaiting more success reports (and hopefully
testsuite results to prove there are no regressions) from V5.1A users.

	Rainer

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University

Email: ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE

References:
- 3.0.3 PATCH: Properly fix stdio.h on Tru64 UNIX V5.1A
  - From: Rainer Orth
- Re: 3.0.3 PATCH: Properly fix stdio.h on Tru64 UNIX V5.1A
  - From: Bruce Korb

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]