This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Ada] Trivial fix for warning in utils.c

From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
To: guerby at acm dot org
Cc: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 20:35:49 +0000
Subject: Re: [Ada] Trivial fix for warning in utils.c
References: <200111161928.fAGJSW44010685@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> <200111161935.fAGJZTf17398@ulmo.localdomain>

guerby@acm.org wrote:-

> Looking in other ada/*.c files both style are used (PARAMS((void)) vs
> (void))

Using PARAMS ((void)) is fine whatever your compiler; on K & R it expands
to () and for ANSI compilers it becomes (void).

It's in the function definition that it really matters what you do.

Sorry for not putting the declaration in gigi.h; I never noticed that.
I assumed GNAT pulled it all in from tree.h like other front ends do.
I'll get it right in future.

Neil.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ada] Trivial fix for warning in utils.c
  - From: Florian Weimer

References:
- Re: [Ada] Trivial fix for warning in utils.c
  - From: John David Anglin
- Re: [Ada] Trivial fix for warning in utils.c
  - From: guerby

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]