This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: hopefully, last draft of altivec...


On Wed, 2001-11-07 at 14:38, Dale Johannesen wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, November 7, 2001, at 11:31 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> 
> > at geoff's request, a repost...
> > *************** extern int rs6000_debug_arg;		/* debug a
> > *** 716,722 ****
> >      31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19,	\
> >      18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12,				\
> >      64, 66, 65, 						\
> > !    73, 1, 2, 67, 76}
> >
> >   /* True if register is floating-point.  */
> >   #define FP_REGNO_P(N) ((N) >= 32 && (N) <= 63)
> > --- 766,779 ----
> >      31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19,	\
> >      18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12,				\
> >      64, 66, 65, 						\
> > !    73, 1, 2, 67, 76,					\
> > !    /* AltiVec registers.  */				\
> > !    77, 78,						\
> > !    90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80,		\
> > !    79,							\
> > !    96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91,				\
> > !    108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97 \
> > ! }
> 
> You still need a vrsave entry here.  Otherwise it looks fine
> (although I have no approval authority).

why do i need a vrsave entry in the register allocation order?  vrsave
will never get allocated.  i mean, sure i can add it, but what will it
do?

-- 
Aldy Hernandez			E-mail: aldyh@redhat.com
Professional Gypsy
Red Hat, Inc.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]