This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch: another set of cross-compile target warning cleanups
- To: hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com
- Subject: Re: Patch: another set of cross-compile target warning cleanups
- From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 09:18:15 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com>
>
> > Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:22:36 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
>
> > Tested via cross compiles of cc1 for the following targets:
>
> FWIW, you should use a simulator setup and full build and test
> where possible, not just compile cc1. See simtest-howto.html.
> (I believe mips is broken ATM.)
Agreed, given infinite CPU, disk, clock time and labor. :-)
But I'm trying to test over 40 targets, so for now I'll have to stick
to building cc1 to get it done in a reasonable amount of time.
Perhaps eventually for some of them I'll do more testing.
> > * cris.h (EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO): Fix unsigned>=0 warning.
>
> (There was a warning? Ouch! I though I'd checked -- famous last words.)
>
Actualy, IIRC the cris target was in really good shape. Thanks.
> IN_RANGE has *inclusive* limits, so change that 4 to 3. And
> space before the (. Ok with those changes.
> brgds, H-P
Done. Good catch!
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi Engagement Manager / Project Services
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu Qwest Internet Solutions