This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: find_sub_basic_blocks vs eh

To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Subject: Re: find_sub_basic_blocks vs eh
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:45:25 -0700
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010919112556.A11278@twiddle.net> <20010920141530.A22391@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:15:30PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> The idea was that splitters should not introduce new trapping instructions
> when the previous ones didn't trap.
> 
> How exactly do you introduce them?

They weren't introduced; they were there beforehand as well.


r~

References:
- find_sub_basic_blocks vs eh
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: find_sub_basic_blocks vs eh
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]