This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [v3] bump versioning on branch


Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:

| On Aug 14, 2001, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> wrote:
| 
| > - libstdc___la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 3:0:0 -lm
| > + libstdc___la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 3:1:0 -lm
|   
| This would mean that GCC 3.0.1's libstdc++-v3 is binary compatible
| with 3.0's, which I'm not sure is the case given some differences in
| the layout of empty or virtual base classes (I don't recall exactly).
| If these changes don't affect libstdc++-v3, this patch is ok.

Mark, is there any patch on the branch which makes g++-3.0.1
incompatible with g++-3.0?

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]