This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Use move-if-change in libstdc++-v3
- To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use move-if-change in libstdc++-v3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 11 Aug 2001 15:55:08 -0300
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010809114134.02474b00@mail.lauterbach.com>
On Aug 9, 2001, Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> wrote:
> Do you also see a broken (look at the pathes for -L and libdir)
> libstdc++.la getting installed? Currently I have to manually massage
> these (nof multilib on PPC) with a perl script :-(
Yep, known problem, already reported in gnats.
> I'm tempted to file this as a high priority bug for 3.0.1
I don't see why it's high priority. I agree the -L flags pointing
into the build tree shouldn't be there, but I don't think this is a
big deal. Anyway, fixing this problem will require changes in
libtool, so it is the libtool folks (myself included) that should be
bugged about it.
> as especially with newer libtool/autoconf this tends to break
> package compiling if you don't have the install root and build
> directories of gcc3 lying around.
In what sense does it break?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me