This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: What is Happening with g++.dg/opt/alias1.C?
- To: oldham at codesourcery dot com
- Subject: Re: What is Happening with g++.dg/opt/alias1.C?
- From: Jason Merrill <jason_merrill at redhat dot com>
- Date: 08 Aug 2001 10:56:45 +0100
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <200108080338.UAA08550@oz.codesourcery.com>
>>>>> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Oldham <oldham@codesourcery.com> writes:
> For gcc 3.1, gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/alias1.C was created today, but
> I could not find any message sent to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org and no
> entry in gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog. Did I miss them?
You missed the message to gcc-patches, entitled "PATCH to get_alias_set".
Unfortunately, the regression tester showed 19 new failures in the g77
testsuite with the patch, so I reverted it until I could determine what the
problem was. I didn't think to XFAIL the new test in the meantime, sorry.
I never add entries to the testsuite ChangeLog for new tests; it seems
pointless. I asked Mark for his thoughts on the subject, and he concurs.
> The cvs log file is:
> ----------------------------
> revision 1.2
> date: 2001/08/07 12:54:10; author: jason; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1
> oops
> ----------------------------
> revision 1.1
> date: 2001/08/07 11:13:54; author: jason; state: Exp;
> * alias.c (get_alias_set): Return a previously calculated
> alias set for a VAR_DECL.
> What do these entries mean?
The 1.1 entry indicates the patch which fixes the testcase. The 1.2 entry
is me fixing a syntax error in the dg-options line.
> For mips-sgi-irix6.5 3.1, alias1's execution fails. Is this to be
> expected?
Until the patch is applied again, yes.
Jason