This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: preofile.c versus setjmp

To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Subject: Re: preofile.c versus setjmp
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 10:24:47 -0700
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, patches at x86-64 dot org
References: <20010807133333.M30939@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20010807095118.B24888@redhat.com> <20010807190647.L23798@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 07:06:47PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> If after, code will jump into assumption, that it can insert code after.

I don't see how it'll be treated much differently than
any other abnormal critical edge.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patches] Re: preofile.c versus setjmp
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- preofile.c versus setjmp
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: preofile.c versus setjmp
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: preofile.c versus setjmp
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]