This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [ast-optimizer-branch]: Inlinability checks

To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: [ast-optimizer-branch]: Inlinability checks
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 01:33:02 -0700
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <3B5BEC0E.D2244D1D@codesourcery.com> <20010723124017.B17541@redhat.com> <3B5D2BE8.149CEA8@codesourcery.com>

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 09:03:52AM +0100, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Thinking more about this, any well-formed routine taking label
> addresses must also have a computed goto ...

Incorrect.  Consider

    printf("Here %p\n", &&loc);
  loc:

> Is my patch wrong, or just over pessimistic here?

Overpessimistic.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ast-optimizer-branch]: Inlinability checks
  - From: Nathan Sidwell

References:
- [ast-optimizer-branch]: Inlinability checks
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: [ast-optimizer-branch]: Inlinability checks
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [ast-optimizer-branch]: Inlinability checks
  - From: Nathan Sidwell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]