This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor
- To: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor
- From: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 19:20:03 -0400 (EDT)
- cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Alexandre Petit-Bianco wrote:
> > The simplest patch didn't work because dropping super() has the
> > unexpected side effect of preventing calls to finit$.
>
> It needs to because the constructor might dictate hidden finit$
> args. Your patch causes a regression on my side. I'll look into it.
hmm... I didn't see a regression, but then I'm getting many testsuite
failures for unrelated reasons.
Under what circumstances are there hidden args? Do you have a test case?
Jeff