This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Add more tree dump options, remove inconsistencies
- To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: Add more tree dump options, remove inconsistencies
- From: Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot oz dot au>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 06:52:05 +1000
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <3B1132E3.22473214@codesourcery.com> <20010603235934A.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <3B1B9414.5AABE2A8@codesourcery.com>
On 04-Jun-2001, Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> 4) rather than `preoptimize' & `postoptimize' I've named them `raw' &
> `cooked'. If you have a better suggestion, please make it.
`raw' and `cooked' are definitely much worse, IMHO.
`preoptimize' and `postoptimize' were much clearer.
If you really want something more concise,
I'd suggest `orig' for the initial tree and `opt' for the
tree after optimization. This scales a little better when
additional passes are inserted; the initial tree is named
`orig', and each susequent tree is named after the pass that
produced it.
--
Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au> | "I have always known that the pursuit
| of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.