This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: not so trivial powerpc regression fix

To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Subject: Re: not so trivial powerpc regression fix
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 15:25:23 -0700
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu
References: <20010518234143.B11639@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20010518145329.B27830@redhat.com> <20010518235933.E11639@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 11:59:33PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > This is incorrect.  The correct way to tell if we're offsettting
> > the memory is to check subreg_lowpart_p.
> Really? On little endian machine, lowpart lies on offsetted memory.

I'm sorry.  I should think before I respond.  Of course
the test is correct.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: not so trivial powerpc regression fix
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- not so trivial powerpc regression fix
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: not so trivial powerpc regression fix
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: not so trivial powerpc regression fix
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]