This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [RFA];

To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
Subject: Re: [RFA];
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 10:07:30 -0700
Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc at cambridge dot redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <m31yppqocp.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com> <200105161535.QAA05279@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 04:35:44PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> Do you have a testcase which shows up this failure, particularly on the 
> branch -- if so, this is likely to constitute a regression that needs 
> urgent fixing.

If either case, the patch is fine for mainline.


r~

References:
- Re: [RFA];
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: [RFA];
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]