This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFA];
- To: Nick Clifton <nickc at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: [RFA];
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 16:35:44 +0100
- cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: ARM Ltd.
- Reply-To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
> Hi Richard,
>
> > I believe this is wrong to the extent that you can't use
> > HARD_REGNO_NREGS on a pseudo.
>
> *sigh* Yes.
>
> > Funnily enough, I fixed exactly the same problem myself yesterday by
> > breaking out most of the code to a new function (in much the same way that
> > mark_set_1 does). Here's my patch:
>
> Great minds think (almost) alike.
>
> OK I withdraw my patch in favor of yours.
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>
Nick,
Do you have a testcase which shows up this failure, particularly on the
branch -- if so, this is likely to constitute a regression that needs
urgent fixing. (I found it while working on some new back-end code, so
can't use that as justification).
R.