This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Documentation generation patch [Take 2]

To: jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk
Subject: Re: Documentation generation patch [Take 2]
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 11:09:48 -0700
Cc: Theodore dot Papadopoulo at sophia dot inria dot fr, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <20010511100937D.mitchell@codesourcery.com><Pine.LNX.4.33.0105111851200.17554-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>

>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph S Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> writes:

    Joseph> One thing that might also make sense - which would make
    Joseph> adding other versions of the manual easier without
    Joseph> commiting to any particular scheme - would be to move most
    Joseph> of the text within gcc.texi to separate files, so gcc.texi
    Joseph> does nothing much other than include the individual
    Joseph> chapters. 

This is a most excellent idea.

Also good, but totally orthogonal, would be to move the various .texi
files into a doc subdirectory so that we didn't have as much clutter
in the main gcc directory.

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Documentation generation patch [Take 2]
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

References:
- Re: Documentation generation patch [Take 2]
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Documentation generation patch [Take 2]
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]