This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: scan_one_insn() doesn't keep REG_N_REFS accurate

To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: scan_one_insn() doesn't keep REG_N_REFS accurate
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Date: 09 May 2001 10:39:15 -0300
Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
References: <org0embx6d.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><or1yq6af5y.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

On May  3, 2001, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:

> 	* regclass.c (scan_one_insn): Update REG_N_REFS when optimizing
> 	handling of two-address insns.

I'm checking this in, approved by Richard Henderson.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

References:
- scan_one_insn() doesn't keep REG_N_REFS accurate
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: scan_one_insn() doesn't keep REG_N_REFS accurate
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]