This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
On Monday 07 May 2001 21:21, law@redhat.com wrote: > In message <01050200330901.11376@enzo.bigblue.local>you write: > > > Thanks. From looking at things, I suspect that this stuff would > > > probably fail with gcc-2.95.x in a similar manner. > > > > No, this was the case with the first version Bernd applied and the > > reverted gain. The current version in 2_95 works annd tests fine for > > me so far. > > OK. CSE does things a little diffferently between 2.95 and 3.0 which > requires jump.c to work a little differently -- probably. I'm still > pondering a design/implementation question in my head about how CSE > ought to work. Hehe, so you are deep into CSE now? Maybe you can approve my CSE patch posted yesterday then after you are finished :-). If I should test anything for you, let me know. Franz.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |