This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: XFAIL tests that aren't regressions
>>>>> "Franz" == Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> writes:
Franz> To be honest, I find the current situation with the branch
Franz> a little bit frustrating. On powerpc-linux-gnu I've nearly
Me, too. :-)
Franz> more feedback would be nice, _especially_ when we are
Do you mean more feedback from me? If so, I'm sorry -- I've been very
busy with both the release and other projects. But, ask me anything,
and I'll try to answer!
Franz> Well, I just fixed the 73 FAILS for ObjC (if someone OK's
Great!
Franz> Another point on loop-2b, why not just disable this
Franz> particular optimization on the branch? Seems more correct
Franz> to me.
This failure has always been there. We only want to fix regressions
at this point. Perturbing things is *always* risky. Look at Nathan's
innocent template/namespace-fixing patch this morning; what looked
simple broke libgcj. We want to be as conservative as possible while
still fixing the regressions.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com