This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Why XFAIL gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2b.x?
- To: "Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com>
- Subject: Re: Why XFAIL gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2b.x?
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 10:31:33 -0700
- Cc: "'gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- References: <8D00C32549556B4E977F81DBC24E985D1B197D@crtsmail1.technol_exch.corp.riotinto.org>
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 04:33:35AM -0000, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
> I note that gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2b.x has been XFAILed in the
> testsuite. I don't think this is correct, as this failure is a regression
> from gcc-2.95.
It isn't, really. That bug fails off and on depending on
the optimizers that run before and how good a job they do.
The bug wasn't fixed for 2.95, merely obscured. Nor was
it really broken by the patch you reference in the PR.
r~