This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: PATCH: Place manuals under the GDFL

To: zackw at Stanford dot EDU
Subject: Re: PATCH: Place manuals under the GDFL
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 20:06:25 -0700
Cc: jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <Pine.LNX.4.32.0105010044410.1603-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk><20010430173129L.mitchell@codesourcery.com><20010430174902.H6612@stanford.edu>

>>>>> "Zack" == Zack Weinberg <zackw@Stanford.EDU> writes:

    >>  In my opinion, we should just remove the man-pages, or replace
    >> them with stubs that point to the TeXinfo documentation.

    Zack> I must respectfully disagree.  The user community has made
    Zack> quite clear that it wants substantial manpages.  They are
    Zack> generated from the TeXinfo documentation, so there is no
    Zack> real maintenance burden.

OK.  But I don't think we should do anything special to try to
eliminate the GFDL there.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- Re: PATCH: Place manuals under the GDFL
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: PATCH: Place manuals under the GDFL
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: PATCH: Place manuals under the GDFL
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]