This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: XFAIL tests that aren't regressions
- To: John David Anglin <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>
- Subject: Re: PATCH: XFAIL tests that aren't regressions
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zackw at stanford dot edu>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:32:58 -0700
- Cc: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>, mark at codesourcery dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <01043017534002.21472@enzo.bigblue.local> <200104301606.MAA03126@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:06:47PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > The test belongs into the ieee subdir because it relies on correct IEEE math,
> > it's just that ieee.exp shoudn't use -ffloat-store unconditionally on all
> > platforms.
> >
> > So I would say move the test on both mainline and branch, and put fixing
> > ieee.exp on the mainline TODO list.
>
> On the subject of the ieee tests and XFAILS, I have this patch to disable
> ieee stuff for the vax. It may be a bit moldy. It would be better if
> I could just turn off ieee.exp on the vax.
# VAX does not have hardware support for IEEE arithmetic.
if { [istarget "vax-*-*"] } { return }
at the top of ieee.exp, maybe?
zw