This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: C++ PATCH: Fix PR 862


>>>>> "Jason" == Jason Merrill <jason_merrill@redhat.com> writes:

    >> I think we should document flags in invoke.texi the moment they
    >> go into the compiler.  If nothing else, that will force us to
    >> clearly define what the purpose of the option is, in English.
    >> If we can't do that, then the option is not even ready to be in
    >> the development stage.

    Jason> I agree for flags (such as -fvtable-gc) that are intended
    Jason> to be used by users one day.  I don't know that I agree for
    Jason> flags that are merely a development convenience.  For
    Jason> instance, to switch on and off a piece of code that some
    Jason> day should be always on, as with -fnew-abi.

    Jason> But if you feel strongly about it, I'll concede the point.

Thanks!

If you send me some documentation (or an even an informal explanation)
for -fvtable-gc, I'll incorporate it, and turn the switch/tests back
on for the mainline.

Yours,

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]