This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Limited number of asm operands
- To: Andi Kleen <freitag at alancoxonachip dot com>
- Subject: Re: Limited number of asm operands
- From: Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot oz dot au>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 01:07:28 +1000
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, geoffk at geoffk dot org
- References: <15079.62804.644511.310033@i30nb2.ira.uka.de.suse.lists.egcs-patches> <jm4rvbfkvz.fsf@geoffk.org.suse.lists.egcs-patches> <oup3daueez4.fsf@pigdrop.muc.suse.de>
On 27-Apr-2001, Andi Kleen <freitag@alancoxonachip.com> wrote:
> For >10 arguments you really don't want numbers anymore, labelled arguments
> would make much more sense.
Ah, good point. You've convinced me.
Scrap my previous suggestion about a transitional warning...
--
Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au> | "I have always known that the pursuit
| of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.