This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: C++ and Java CNI: Check Java references

To: tromey at redhat dot com
Subject: Re: C++ and Java CNI: Check Java references
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:35:21 -0700
Cc: rth at redhat dot com, aph at cambridge dot redhat dot com, per at bothner dot com, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <15077.50312.266407.135649@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><20010424140607.C9563@redhat.com><8766fuyllr.fsf@creche.redhat.com>

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:

    Tom> Yeah, I agree.  What sort of performance penalty can we
    Tom> expect from that?

Small now, none later.  With the new C++ inliner, the penalties should
be very slight -- especially on those systems where you have an MMU
and so don't need to do the check.  In the future, the abstraction
penalty here should be completely eliminated.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: C++ and Java CNI: Check Java references
  - From: Jason Merrill

References:
- Re: C++ and Java CNI: Check Java references
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: C++ and Java CNI: Check Java references
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: C++ and Java CNI: Check Java references
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]