This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ PATCH: Diagnose use of abstract class in function prototype
>>>>> "Gabriel" == Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com> writes:
Gabriel> Since C++ (sadly) isn't used in GNU software, it's harder
Gabriel> to find | examples where fixing a non-regression is vital
Gabriel> in C++.
Gabriel> Which means C++ isn't supported?
No -- it means that fixing *non-regressions* is almost never a
priority for a release.
That doesn't mean "C++ isn't supported".
The whole point is to *support* our C++ user base by eliminating
regressions, thereby providing a consistent, improving compiler.
That's exactly why I don't want to introduce risk -- each new patch
makes it harder to fulfill that basic contract: that GCC 3.0 be as
good as GCC 2.95 so that people can upgrade as easily as possible.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com