Re: C++: constant folding in a conditional expr

[Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>]

Andrew Haley wrote:

> So, what would the legal form of this program be?  Like this, I guess:
> 
> class Foo
> {
>   public:
>     static const unsigned ACONST = 0;
>     static const unsigned BCONST = 1;
> 
>     void SetData(bool p);
> 
>   private:
>     unsigned _data;
> };
> 
> const unsigned Foo::ACONST;
> const unsigned Foo::BCONST;
yes these two are the definitions. And of course, they must obey the one
definition rule. [3.2]

nathan

-- 
Dr Nathan Sidwell   ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::   CodeSourcery LLC
         'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org