This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Dependence tracking broke implicit extern "C"

To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: Dependence tracking broke implicit extern "C"
From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 08:12:10 +0000
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <org0gooxl7.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <orelvythuy.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

Alexandre Oliva wrote:-

> On Mar  8, 2001, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > from  Alexandre Oliva  <aoliva@redhat.com>
> > 	* cppfiles.c (stack_include_file): Use MAX of sysp.
> 
> I'm checking this in, approved in private by Zack Weinberg.

Thanks, sorry for missing it (maybe put cpp or cpplib in the subject?).
I think it should be applied to both trees, no?  (If you haven't already,
that is).

Neil.

References:
- Dependence tracking broke implicit extern "C"
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Dependence tracking broke implicit extern "C"
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]