This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [RFA] Use "-idirafter /usr/include/w32api" in cygwin specs

To: "Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com>, "'gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Use "-idirafter /usr/include/w32api" in cygwin specs
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 19:14:44 -0500
References: <8D00C32549556B4E977F81DBC24E985DC71D@crtsmail1.technol_exch.corp.riotinto.org> <20010310175226.A24708@redhat.com>

On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 05:52:26PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 12:29:23PM -0000, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
>>174 warnings in stage 3 of a bootstrap on cygwin come from header files in
>>/usr/include/w32api.  This patch eliminates them by make the files system
>>headers (using -dirafter in place of -I).  It also reverts the include
>>directory search path order to that of gcc-2.95, with /usr/include/w32api
>>last.  
>
>I'll check in the current layout from the cygwin net release.  It uses
>-idirafter for w32api and has some other minor reorgs.

Done.

Does this work any better?

cgf

References:
- [RFA] Use "-idirafter /usr/include/w32api" in cygwin specs
  - From: Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
- Re: [RFA] Use "-idirafter /usr/include/w32api" in cygwin specs
  - From: Christopher Faylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]