This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

FATAL_EXIT_CODE - why 33?

To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: FATAL_EXIT_CODE - why 33?
From: "Zack Weinberg" <zackw at stanford dot edu>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 20:37:27 -0800

Does anyone know why the usual definition of FATAL_EXIT_CODE by
xm-foo.h is 33?  I am considering having it default to EXIT_FAILURE
(C89 required macro in <stdlib.h>) which is usually 1 on unix family OSes.

zw

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FATAL_EXIT_CODE - why 33?
  - From: Fergus Henderson
- Re: FATAL_EXIT_CODE - why 33?
  - From: Michael Meissner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]