This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Alternate booleans patch
- To: Zack Weinberg <zackw at stanford dot edu>
- Subject: Re: Alternate booleans patch
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:09:12 -0800
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20010227221548.M27567@wolery.stanford.edu>
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 10:15:48PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> It also provides us with a universal definition of a 'bool' type,
> which is the C99 _Bool if available.
Ok for mainline. Thanks.
I see Fergus found one mistake (which I missed in reading the patch).
It appears that that is the only instance of the old variable being
an integer, and thus the new define being readily substitutable, which
limits the likelyhood of there being too many others.
But it wouldn't hurt to check an (n+1)th time.
r~