This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [patch] fix semantics for walk_stmt_tree()


On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Mark Mitchell wrote:

> >>>>> "Diego" == Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>     Diego> Bootstrapped on x86 on mainline. Should this go in the 3.0
>     Diego> branch?
> 
> No -- I don't think it fixes a bug.
> 
OK.

> And, please return error_mark_node instead of (tree) 1.  That, at
> least, is something you can look at in the debugger without crashing
> the debugger.
> 
Ah, that's what I was looking for. Thanks.

I will make prune_unused_decls return error_mark_node and check
the patch on the mainline.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]