This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] fix semantics for walk_stmt_tree()
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> >>>>> "Diego" == Diego Novillo <email@example.com> writes:
> Diego> Bootstrapped on x86 on mainline. Should this go in the 3.0
> Diego> branch?
> No -- I don't think it fixes a bug.
> And, please return error_mark_node instead of (tree) 1. That, at
> least, is something you can look at in the debugger without crashing
> the debugger.
Ah, that's what I was looking for. Thanks.
I will make prune_unused_decls return error_mark_node and check
the patch on the mainline.