This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Add testcase for fixed bug 64

To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: Add testcase for fixed bug 64
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
Date: 21 Feb 2001 12:52:29 +0100
Cc: gdr at codesourcery dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <fld7ckjvpp.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <20010215100032J.mitchell@codesourcery.com>

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

| Yes, that's fine.
| 
| I think we should stick with the old-deja framework for C++ test-cases
| for now, though.  Or is there a reason that the dg-do machinery is
| better in this case?

Not, in this case.

BTW, I would like to know GCC position vis-a-vis The new-style
framework. Any recommendation?

-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC                       http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Add testcase for fixed bug 64
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Add testcase for fixed bug 64
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Add testcase for fixed bug 64
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]