This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: new allocator df.c: forgotten apply_change_group


Hi,

On 18 Feb 2001, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > `link' is a link to wrong hard reg in reg_raw_mode if `reg' consists
> > of a few consecutive hard regs.
>
> Hmmm.
> I don't think your right. If you were, we'd end up with a lot more

Denis is right in some way.  For coalescing the code is interested in the
lowest numbered hard reg for a move involving a multi-hardregs pseudo.
This all is fixed more or less in my new version, but I did some things
wrong with my ssh public key, so still have no CVS access.  Will be fixed,
if I have.

> > PS: toplev.c from CVS don't have a call to `mm_reg_alloc', and
> > ra.c don't have a call to `reload'.
>
> Err, yes it does,

Only on your local version, trust him ;-)  toplev.c in CVS is still your
version with references to your allocator.


Ciao,
Michael.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]