This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libtool (was Re: [patch] releases.html)
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:00:49PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> "Zack Weinberg" <zackw@Stanford.EDU> writes:
> > Yes, libbackend.so might be nice just to reduce disk consumption.
> > (Didn't HJ have patches for this a long, long, time ago?) Wouldn't
> > it cause arguments about opening loopholes for non-free front ends,
> > though?
> Why should we not be able to further the usefulness and usability of a
> free software project because someone, somewhere, might find it
> slightly easier to integrate into something that may make it illegal,
> or not illegal, for them to redistribute it.
You're preaching to (mostly) the choir. The FSF is that --> way. :-|
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com | pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools. Fools are protected by more capable fools.