This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [c++] -fvtable-gc reorg

To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: [c++] -fvtable-gc reorg
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:41:09 -0800
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010212235214.A22074@redhat.com> <u9k86upqon.fsf@casey.cambridge.redhat.com>

On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 03:07:20PM +0000, Jason Merrill wrote:
> It seems a bit odd to me that the VTABLE_REF wraps the CALL_EXPR rather
> than going inside, to express the load from the vtable.

Perhaps.  For no particular reason I'd got it in my head
to annotate the CALL_INSN.  I imagine that it'd work just
as well either way.

r~

References:
- [c++] -fvtable-gc reorg
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [c++] -fvtable-gc reorg
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]