This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [patches] Re: i386 REGISTER_MOVE_COST fix, SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED/PREFERRED_RELOAD_CLASS cleanup

To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Subject: Re: [patches] Re: i386 REGISTER_MOVE_COST fix, SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED/PREFERRED_RELOAD_CLASS cleanup
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:00:17 -0800
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, patches at x86-64 dot org
References: <20010212195832.N18914@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20010212111319.A15239@redhat.com> <20010212225746.A11491@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 10:57:46PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> OK, this means that I can do that while applying to mainline too?

Yes.

> SSE and sledgehammer are going to even more complicate these beasts so
> I agree it is good idea.

Exactly what I was thinking.  ;-)


r~

References:
- i386 REGISTER_MOVE_COST fix, SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED/PREFERRED_RELOAD_CLASS cleanup
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: i386 REGISTER_MOVE_COST fix, SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED/PREFERRED_RELOAD_CLASS cleanup
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [patches] Re: i386 REGISTER_MOVE_COST fix, SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED/PREFERRED_RELOAD_CLASS cleanup
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]