This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH] Remove gratuitous demangler differences


On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 04:53:33AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>Daniel Berlin <dberlin@redhat.com> writes:
>| This patch removes differences between the old and new demangler that
>| really aren't necessary (unsigned vs unsigned int, () vs (void)).
>
>It is desirable that the demangled names match as much as possible
>V3/C++-STYLE

Can I ask what V3/C++-STYLE might be and why this is desirable?

I'm (obviously) completely uninitiated in this, but maintaining the same
demangling representation certainly makes sense as far as gdb is
concerned, so I'm interested in the rationale for keeping it different.

cgf


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]