This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [patch] java run-time stack trace

To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: [patch] java run-time stack trace
From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Date: 08 Feb 2001 09:57:34 -0700
Cc: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>, Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <m2vgqles2s.fsf@kelso.bothner.com> <3A8225CB.7A9A5D9C@albatross.co.nz> <14978.26588.658843.695322@viagra.cambridge.redhat.com>
Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:

Andrew> It's clear that people have very different requirements for
Andrew> backtrace: any change should be configurable, and IMO runtime
Andrew> configurable.

We could introduce a System property for this.
Classpath does that all over the place.

Then people could specify it at compile time (gcj -D) or at runtime
(via gij or System.setProperty).

Tom

References:
- [patch] java run-time stack trace
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: [patch] java run-time stack trace
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: [patch] java run-time stack trace
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]