This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: none
- To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at wins dot uva dot nl>
- Subject: Re: none
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: 01 Feb 2001 04:41:13 +0100
- Cc: gdr at codesourcery dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, aoliva at redhat dot com
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <200101311557.f0VFvCR04089@debye.wins.uva.nl>
Mark Kettenis <kettenis@wins.uva.nl> writes:
[...]
| I don't have any checkin priviliges. Besides, my patch did delete the
| Cygwin specific code because I believed that it wasn't necessary
| anymore, but nobody verified this. And Daniel Berlin was looking at
| BeOS and said he would submit a patch, and I more or less assumed that
| would include the sigsetjmp() stuff too since he said it did solve
| some BeOS-specific problems too.
|
| Anyway, Alexandres patch looks good to me, and even addresses the
| possibility that sigsetjmp is absent. So I'm all for it to apply his
| patch instead.
Thanks for the detailed explanation.
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:
[...]
| Tested on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu, with and without -DHAVE_SIGSETJMP.
| The latter compiled, but would never complete, as before. Ok to
| install?
Alexandre, can't it be possible to detect HAVE_SIGSETJUMP through
autoconf? I would prefer an autocoonf-based solution.
-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com