This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: V3 ABI Java symbol demangling

To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: V3 ABI Java symbol demangling
From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Date: 30 Jan 2001 16:28:51 -0700
Cc: bryce at albatross dot co dot nz, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <3A73C6A2.83BBC6@albatross.co.nz> <20010128123016G.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <3A76136E.EF50BE84@albatross.co.nz> <20010130133712V.mitchell@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com

Bryce> Does this constitute approval of the patch? ;-)

Mark> I think a Java person should do that.  But I am happy.

At this point I'd guess that Bryce has more of a working knowledge of
the demangler than any of the other Java hackers.  I'm positive that
Bryce understands Java syntax (:-) so the only real issue is
correctness.  As long as the modified demangler still passes its test
suite, I'm satisfied.  Adding a few Java tests, even minimal ones,
would be nice, of course.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: V3 ABI Java symbol demangling
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

References:
- V3 ABI Java symbol demangling
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: V3 ABI Java symbol demangling
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: V3 ABI Java symbol demangling
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: V3 ABI Java symbol demangling
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]