This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Sign-extend when truncating a CONST_INTs to a certain mode
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Sign-extend when truncating a CONST_INTs to a certain mode
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 29 Jan 2001 10:32:07 -0200
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
conversion.c would fail with -O3 on a FPU-disabled 64-bit target.
Here's a simplified version of the test:
static inline double u2d(u) unsigned int u; { return u; }
main() { if (u2d(~0U) != (double) ~0U) abort(); exit(0); }
The problem is that the code sequence generated to convert the
unsigned value ~0U to double in the inlined copy of u2d is as follows:
double res = (signed) ~0U;
if ((signed)~0U < 0)
res += pow (2, 32);
The problem is that the conversion of ~U0 to res is folded during cse
*without* sign-extension, so the initial value of res is already
correct. But then, it's added 1<<32, getting almost twice as large as
needed.
I could have fixed this by modifying only the appropriate conversion
operation so as to do a sign-extension, but I decided to try a more
generic approach, and it worked. I.e., i686, alpha and sparc all
bootstrapped with this patch, and the testsuite results weren't the
disaster I had expected at first :-)
Opinions? Ok to install?
Index: gcc/ChangeLog
from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
* explow.c (trunc_int_for_mode): Sign-extend value to mode.
Index: gcc/explow.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/egcs/gcc/explow.c,v
retrieving revision 1.56
diff -u -p -r1.56 explow.c
--- gcc/explow.c 2001/01/22 18:59:36 1.56
+++ gcc/explow.c 2001/01/29 05:36:37
@@ -56,28 +56,16 @@ trunc_int_for_mode (c, mode)
if (mode == BImode)
return c & 1 ? STORE_FLAG_VALUE : 0;
- /* We clear out all bits that don't belong in MODE, unless they and our
- sign bit are all one. So we get either a reasonable negative
- value or a reasonable unsigned value. */
+ /* Sign-extend for the requested mode. */
- if (width < HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT
- && ((c & ((HOST_WIDE_INT) (-1) << (width - 1)))
- != ((HOST_WIDE_INT) (-1) << (width - 1))))
- c &= ((HOST_WIDE_INT) 1 << width) - 1;
-
- /* If this would be an entire word for the target, but is not for
- the host, then sign-extend on the host so that the number will look
- the same way on the host that it would on the target.
-
- For example, when building a 64 bit alpha hosted 32 bit sparc
- targeted compiler, then we want the 32 bit unsigned value -1 to be
- represented as a 64 bit value -1, and not as 0x00000000ffffffff.
- The later confuses the sparc backend. */
-
- if (BITS_PER_WORD < HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT
- && BITS_PER_WORD == width
- && (c & ((HOST_WIDE_INT) 1 << (width - 1))))
- c |= ((HOST_WIDE_INT) (-1) << width);
+ if (width < HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT)
+ {
+ HOST_WIDE_INT sign = 1;
+ sign <<= width - 1;
+ c &= (sign << 1) - 1;
+ c ^= sign;
+ c -= sign;
+ }
return c;
}
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me