This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [v3] libstdc++/944/1019/1057/others
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: [v3] libstdc++/944/1019/1057/others
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Date: 16 Jan 2001 09:24:40 +0000
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <200101160751.f0G7pT120438@fillmore.constant.com>
>>>>> "Benjamin" == Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
> ! gribble::gribble()
> ! : _M_private_data(0), _M_more_stuff(0), _M_helper(0);
> --- 99,106 ----
> ! gribble::gribble() :
> ! _M_private_data(0), _M_more_stuff(0), _M_helper(0);
This change breaks with the GNU C convention of putting the operator on the
next line. Any reason to do so?
> + 13. Spacing WRT return statements.
> + no extra spacing before returns
This doesn't seem like something that needs a rule. In my own code,
sometimes I have an extra line before the return, sometimes not, depending
on the grouping of the code that comes before it.
Jason