This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFA] move C++-related nodes into the correct section
- To: rearnsha at arm dot com
- Subject: Re: [RFA] move C++-related nodes into the correct section
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: 12 Jan 2001 13:48:01 +0100
- Cc: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <200101121005.KAA10247@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> writes:
| > On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 10:01:06AM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
| > > pedwards@disaster.jaj.com said:
| > >
| > > +@cindex ARM
| > > +
| > >
| > > Is there any chance that the "ARM" acronym here can be expanded (in
| > > brackets afterwards). As the ARM in this context receeds further into
| > > history, it is more and more likely to be confused with the ARM processor.
| >
| > Bothered me, too. :-) Does
| >
| > @cindex ARM [Annotated C++ Reference Manual]
| >
| > work for you?
|
| Excellent. (And maybe in the body of that paragraph as well).
100% agreed.
-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com