This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Instantiate virtual args in function-call usage

To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: Instantiate virtual args in function-call usage
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:01:43 -0800
Cc: law at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <12941.979091338@upchuck> <orn1cxdb1i.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20010111144804.E7931@redhat.com> <orofxdaco7.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 09:31:36PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > Surely eliminate_regs_in_insn needs changes as well?
> 
> I didn't find a need for it.  Maybe just because reload() cleans up
> afterwards?

Oh, nevermind.  You call eliminate_regs yourself while
fixing things up.  And of course function_usage things
aren't used during reload itself.

The patch is fine.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Instantiate virtual args in function-call usage
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

References:
- Re: Instantiate virtual args in function-call usage
  - From: Jeffrey A Law
- Re: Instantiate virtual args in function-call usage
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Instantiate virtual args in function-call usage
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Instantiate virtual args in function-call usage
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]