This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: RFA+RFC: toplev.c hooks

To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: RFA+RFC: toplev.c hooks
From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 18:47:00 +0000
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010106173006.B30246@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20010106103800.B22798@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson wrote:-

> I'm not in favour of this as it stands.  We have a _lot_ more
> language hooks than this.  If you're planning on moving them
> all here, maybe.

Exactly, that's what I was proposing to do, but not all in that
preliminary patch.  So should I

a) add yet another lang_post_options () function and put it in all
front ends (ugly IMO),

b) go ahead with the patch, and then start putting other hooks in the
lang_hooks structure, or

c) something else you prefer?

Thanks,

Neil.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFA+RFC: toplev.c hooks
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- RFA+RFC: toplev.c hooks
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: RFA+RFC: toplev.c hooks
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]